#
JOURNAL Service
Area we solve?

Revision of Journals for Publication Success

As the top PhD consultation in India, RESEARCH TALK offers first-rate journal revision or journal comments corrections for your research paper/document in order to get it published in a reputable journal. Our service assures that our clients' submissions will not be rejected due to errors in grammar, writing style/tone, or formatting. We also provide plagiarism eradication services for papers. If you require it, we also provide free technical consultations with our technical experts. As the adage goes, Rome was not constructed in a day, and your paper will be the same in the journal publishing.

It takes several revisions to make a paper/document publishable. Peer-reviewed journal papers will be evaluated by journal editors and other professional academics who will evaluate the quality and scientific value of the article and its research. Papers that pass such criteria are published in peer-reviewed journals/literature.

RESEARCH TALK editors revise journal articles and make adjustments recommended by journal editors and peer reviewers, making your study suitable for publication in prestigious journals. We modify and examine your work for errors before resubmitting it to the journal until it is accepted. We are available to assist you at every level of your research studies, from the beginning to the finish of your PhD journey. Hire us for high-quality assistance and support with your PhD study.

What Is the Primary Goal of Peer Review?

The system of peer review is used to evaluate the quality of a paper before it is published. Peer review has become an integral component of academic writing for journal publication in the scientific world. It contributes to the assurance that publications published in scientific journals address significant research issues and reach reliable findings based on competently handled testing.

How do you reply to reviewer criticisms in a journal?

  • You must address any points raised by the editor and reviewers.
  • Include details about your manuscript's modifications in your response letter.
  • Conduct any further experiments or research the reviewer's recommendations. If not, you will have to accept that they will not improve your paper.
  • Politely and scientifically cancel any statements or opinions with which you disagree. Separate reviewer remarks from your answers in your correspondence.
  • Use a different colour text, underline the change, or use Microsoft Word's track changes feature to clearly illustrate the primary modification in the text.
  • Submit the amended manuscript and answer letter within the timeframe specified by the editor

What Factors Should Be Considered in Journal Comment Correction

Here are the main #3 points to consider while choosing a reviewing journal.

Peer review is an important element of the publication process since it ensures manuscript and journal excellence. It provides input to writers before to the publication of their papers. Its primary objective is to facilitate continued writing through reading, reviewing, and communicating.

Effective peer review promotes scientific quality, spotlights research uniqueness, and advances careers. We discuss major review procedures, as well as rules and ideas for improving article quality.

  • Be kind and give sound advice.
  • Seek help and don't take on too much responsibility.
  • Be scientific and pay attention to the details.
Journal Editor's Role in Publication

The editor determines if your work matches the journal's purpose and scope, then selects reviewers and takes the manuscript through multiple revision phases. Following peer review, the two most typical editing decisions are minor adjustments and significant revisions. Based on the percentage of quality for publishing, the journal editors and reviewers’ team will offer any of the following comments to your manuscript.

MINOR REVISION

THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE EDITED OR EXPANDED BEFORE IT CAN BE PUBLISHED.

MAJOR REVISION

THE ARTICLE NEED EXTENSIVE CORRECTION, SUCH AS NEW LITERATURE OR REWRITING.

ACCEPT

THIS SIGNIFIES THAT THE WORK CAN BE PUBLISHED IN ITS CURRENT FORM.

REJECT

THE NEEDED REVISION IS EXCESSIVE, OR THE MANUSCRIPT DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE JOURNAL.

What Is a Major Journal Revision?

The journal editor's team's major revision suggestions have the ability to affect the study's risk level. This indicates that the revision involves adding or eliminating major procedures, as well as introducing a new set of subjects. Importantly, if there are further errors in the second examination of the document, it is dangerous and the article may be rejected.

What Is a Minor Revision in a Journal?

Minor revision denotes that just a few modifications are required to enhance the text for publication. This will not jeopardise the standard of study. Typically, a document in the minor revision category is not rejected. The errors discovered by the journal editors and peer-reviewers must be fixed before the manuscript may be published.

Frequently Asked Questions

The word” revision” literally means to read things again. i.e., the purpose of revision is to check how your text is organized and to clarify the mistakes in a document such as deleting unnecessary sections and adding needed information

Yes, we will provide revisions, make corrections and resubmit the document until it gets published in the journal. We will modify the document ethically so that it will be made eligible for publication.

Revising is the process of rethinking the paper. We reconsider your arguments, review your purpose, refine your evidence and reorganize the presentation of the paper.

Yes, we will do free corrections until you get 100% satisfaction with our work.

Our editors and reviewers are PhD holding experts and have an excellent paper published in reputed journals.

Sample

Reviewer comments

You choose to analyse the data using a fairly obscure fitting function. In my perspective, a basic Gaussian function would have sufficed. Furthermore, the outcome would be more useful and simpler to compare to previous outcomes.

Response in accordance with the reviewer

The reviewer's assessment of the analysis is shared by us. Our customised function makes it unlikely that the data can be fully understood using conventional ideas. Furthermore, in its current form, we agree that it would be difficult to assess if this measurement represents a considerable increase over previously recorded principle.

It is worth noting that the author is kind and respectful of the reviewer's viewpoint in both remarks. In both cases, the author edits the paper to answer the reviewer's question. When commenting, keep in mind that the reviewer may be really educated. If their advice is incorrect, it is most likely because they incorrectly interpret your paper, indicating that you should make your wording clearer.

Our History of Service

We corrected and revised the research papers in response to the journal editors' and reviewers' feedback, and the articles were successfully published in prestigious publications. We revised papers and published them in periodicals like as

SCOPUS INDEX
SCI
SPRINGER
Q1 PUBLICATION
UGC
ANNEXURE2
ANNEXURE1
INDER SCIENCE
ELSEVIER
IEEE
ACM DIGITAL LIBRARY
TAYLOR AND FRANCIS
Speak with us

Research talk not only offers editing services, but also support throughout the PhD research journey. we are affordably priced and provide the highest quality service throughout India. to learn more about us, send us an email at [email protected], call us @1234567890, or message us on WhatsApp @ 1234567890